Exxon: refining margins normalised faster than guidance admits
Crack spreads have already normalised. The earnings model has not been updated for it.
Evidence · 4 cards
Unlock the full report
The locked call and the disclosures stay visible. The research body unlocks with purchase or subscription.
Discussion · 10
Finally someone put numbers on this. The comp table did more work for me than the narrative did. Has anything in the last print changed the entry you would take?
Honestly, that is the weakest part of the piece. The comp table took longer than the rest of the piece put together, so I am glad it was the useful part.
I have been waiting for someone to make this argument. The regulatory ceiling being quantified changes the model, not just the headline. Interested in what the kill switch looks like in practice.
I think the setup matters more than the thesis here. The lag between intake and revisions is the whole trade. Does the thesis survive a soft guide next quarter?
You are right that I skipped over that. The macro has to be neutral rather than helpful. If it is actively hostile this does not work and nothing in the position hedges that.
This is the second-order point everyone skips. The comp table did more work for me than the narrative did. Interested in what the kill switch looks like in practice.
Finally someone put numbers on this. The destocking signature is textbook and nobody is naming it. What does the bear actually have to be right about?
Thanks for showing the workings. The destocking signature is textbook and nobody is naming it. What does the bear actually have to be right about?
I think the setup matters more than the thesis here. The cohort split is the detail that everyone leaves out. Does the same logic apply to the closest comparable?
Reasonable, and I have thought about it a lot. Rates hit the multiple rather than the earnings path. A 50bp move costs perhaps two turns and does not touch the thesis.