Boeing: services revenue is compounding under a cyclical label
Aftermarket and services now contribute the majority of segment profit and grow independently of the equipment cycle. The whole company is still valued as a cyclical.
Discussion · 9
I think the setup matters more than the thesis here. The distinction between adequate reserves and the earnings path is well made. How much of this do you think is already in the buy side's numbers?
Strong piece, one objection. Splitting volume from price is what makes this legible. How much does this depend on the macro cooperating?
Fair challenge. Invalidation is a close below the lock price on volume, and I should have written that into the card rather than leaving it implicit. (991)
Good piece. The elasticity decay across the price actions is the tell. What would you need to see to add rather than hold?
Strong piece, one objection. I had not appreciated how much of this is already in consensus. Interested in what the kill switch looks like in practice.
I have been waiting for someone to make this argument. The mix argument is the part I had not considered properly. Interested in what the kill switch looks like in practice.
Strong piece, one objection. The installed base argument is stronger than the cycle argument here. Is there a cleaner way to express this than the equity?
Useful framing. The lag between intake and revisions is the whole trade. What is the base rate on this kind of setup working?
Respectfully, I think this overstates it. The cohort split is the detail that everyone leaves out. Any view on how the read-across affects the rest of the group?