JPMorgan: the capital build is finished and the return is not priced
The bank cleared its required ratio with a buffer and the regulatory calendar is clear. What follows is distribution, and the payout is not in the multiple.
Discussion · 6
I came in sceptical. The contract structure matters more than the headline rate. Curious whether you would still size it the same at a higher entry.
Agree with the direction, less with the magnitude. The mix argument is the part I had not considered properly. Where does this break if rates back up another 50bp?
Fair challenge. Invalidation is a close below the lock price on volume, and I should have written that into the card rather than leaving it implicit. (1081)
This is the second-order point everyone skips. The point about conversion rather than demand is the right one. How are you thinking about the timing risk here?
Good piece. The margin bridge is doing more work here than is acknowledged. What would you need to see to add rather than hold?
Finally someone put numbers on this. The distinction between adequate reserves and the earnings path is well made. Does the thesis survive a soft guide next quarter?