Wix: the cost programme has slipped twice without a new date
The savings target has been reiterated without a revised timeline. Reiterating the number while moving the date is how these programmes fail slowly.
Discussion · 9
Useful framing. The mix argument is the part I had not considered properly. Curious whether you would still size it the same at a higher entry.
Partly yes. It survives a soft guide. It does not survive a second one, which is why the horizon is short.
Useful framing. The installed base argument is stronger than the cycle argument here. What would you need to see to add rather than hold?
This is the one I get most. It survives a soft guide. It does not survive a second one, which is why the horizon is short.
This is the clearest write-up I have seen on the name. The utilisation assumption is where I disagree. Does the thesis survive a soft guide next quarter?
Agree with the direction, less with the magnitude. The comp table did more work for me than the narrative did. Where does this break if rates back up another 50bp?
I have been waiting for someone to make this argument. The exclusivity window is the part the market keeps mispricing. Any view on how the read-across affects the rest of the group?
This is the second-order point everyone skips. The channel data is what makes this hard to dismiss. Does the thesis survive a soft guide next quarter?
Good piece. The cohort split is the detail that everyone leaves out. Would you underwrite this without the catalyst date?