RESEARCHJPM
JPMorgan: peak returns on equity is a poor entry point
Quality is not in dispute. The price assumes the current return on equity is the through-cycle number, and it is not.
The mechanism is the through-cycle return on equity. A multiple of book implies a sustainable return, and paying a peak multiple on a peak return double-counts the same optimism.
The return on equity is at a cycle high by the bank's own long-run disclosure, and the multiple is at the high end of its own ten-year range at the same time.
The position: no call. This is a name I want to own and not at this level, so there is nothing locked here and nothing for the record to grade. If the entry improves I will say so in a piece that does carry a call.
A credit cycle would overwhelm the operating leverage argument entirely, and expense discipline is the first thing to break when revenue falls.
Discussion · 3
Ines FerreiraAUG 17
Not convinced, but well argued. The contract structure matters more than the headline rate. Does the same logic apply to the closest comparable?
32
Marco BianchiAUG 17
Good piece. The installed base argument is stronger than the cycle argument here. Has anything in the last print changed the entry you would take?
32
Marco BianchiAUG 16
Respectfully, I think this overstates it. The channel data is what makes this hard to dismiss. What would you need to see to add rather than hold?
0